EPD-IES-0032021:001

DUCOGRILLE CLASSIC 130HP AND 60HP

This EPD covers the DucoGrille Classic 130 HP and DucoGrille 60 HP, which belong to the same product family. Both variants are manufactured using identical materials, surface treatments, and production processes. The primary difference lies in the blade geometry, resulting in different aluminium mass per unit area. The DucoGrille Classic 130 HP is selected as the representative product for this study, as it exhibits the highest material intensity and environmental impacts within the product group and is therefore considered a conservative (worst-case) configuration for the declaration. These products are high-performance fixed aluminium louvre Grille, developed and produced by Duco Ventilation & Sun Control NV in Veurne, Belgium. These are part of the DucoGrille range of architectural ventilation components designed for natural air supply and exhaust in façades, doors, and walls.The Grille consists of extruded aluminium profiles (EN AW 6063 T66) with a frame depth of 130 mm and aerodynamically optimised blades that provide high airflow capacity combined with effective rainwater rejection. The assembly is performed with corrosion-resistant fasteners and finished with powder coating. The product contributes to: • Improved indoor air quality through natural ventilation • Energy efficiency by reducing the need for mechanical ventilation • Architectural integration through customisable design and finishes These products are intended for external building applications and is suitable for use in both new construction and renovation projects. The Grille is non-load bearing and must be installed in accordance with Duco’s installation guidelines. It is suitable for temperate climates and buildings with natural or hybrid ventilation systems. Manufacturing process (summary): 1. Extrusion of aluminium profiles (EN AW 6063 T66) 2. Cutting, machining, and assembly of frames and blades 3. Surface finishing via powder coating or anodizing 4. Quality control and packaging for shipment Technical performance: • Airflow characteristics determined according to EN 13030 • Acoustic performance tested according to ISO 10140, where applicable Reference service life: 50 years under normal operating and maintenance conditions. At end-of-life, the aluminium components are 100% recyclable

General information

EPD OwnerDuco Ventilation and Sun Control
Registration numberEPD-IES-0032021:001
EPD typeEPD of multiple products based on a representative product
StatusValid
Version date2026-05-13
Validity date2031-05-13
Standards conformanceISO 14025:2006, EN 15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021
Geographical scopeEurope
An EPD may be updated or depublished if conditions change. This is the latest version of the EPD.

Programme information

ProgrammeInternational EPD System
AddressEPD International AB Box 210 60 SE-100 31 Stockholm Sweden
Websitewww.environdec.com
E-mailsupport@environdec.com

Product category rules

CEN standard EN 15804 serves as the Core Product Category Rules (PCR)
Product Category Rules (PCR)2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) (version 2.0.1) 2.0.1
PCR review was conducted byThe Technical Committee of the International EPD System. See www.environdec.com for a list of members. Review chair: Rob Rouwette (chair), Noa Meron (co-chair). The review panel may be contacted via the Secretariat www.environdec.com/support.
Complementary Product Category Rules (c-PCR)PCR 2019:14-c-PCR-018 Ventilation components (c-PCR under PCR 2019:14) (Adopted from EPD Norway) Version: Adopted from EPD Norway
c-PCR review was conducted byThe Technical Committee of the International EPD System

Verification

Independent third-party verification of the declaration and data, according to ISO 14025:2006, via
Third-party verifierSigita Židonienė (Vesta Consulting)
Approved byThe International EPD® System
Procedure for follow-up of data during EPD validity involves third party verifier
*EPD Process Certification involves an accredited certification body certifying and periodically auditing the EPD process and conducting external and independent verification of EPDs that are regularly published. More information can be found in the General Programme Instructions on www.environdec.com.

Ownership and limitation on use of EPD

Limitations

EPDs within the same product category but published in different EPD programmes, may not be comparable. For two EPDs to be comparable, they shall be based on the same PCR (including the same first-digit version number) or be based on fully aligned PCRs or versions of PCRs; cover products with identical functions, technical performances and use (e.g. identical declared/functional units); have identical scope in terms of included life-cycle stages (unless the excluded life-cycle stage is demonstrated to be insignificant); apply identical impact assessment methods (including the same version of characterisation factors); and be valid at the time of comparison.

Ownership

The EPD Owner has the sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.

Information about EPD Owner

EPD OwnerDuco Ventilation and Sun Control
Contact person nameMartijn Imbo
Contact person e-mailmartijn.imbo@duco.eu
Organisation addressBedrijvenlaan 2 8630 Veurne Belgium
LCA Practitionersuren@enperas.com, suren@enperas.com

Description of the organisation of the EPD Owner

Duco is a leading European manufacturer of innovative ventilation, solar shading and acoustic comfort systems, headquartered in Veurne, Belgium. Since its establishment in 1991, Duco has combined engineering excellence with architectural design to deliver solutions that enhance indoor air quality, thermal comfort and energy efficiency.

Organisation logo

Product information

Product nameDUCOGRILLE CLASSIC 130HP AND 60HP
Product identificationThe products are identified by the model designation “DucoGrille Classic 130HP and 60HP” as defined in Duco’s technical documentation and product catalogue. All dimensional and material specifications correspond to Duco’s internal production standards and the data supplied for this EPD.
Product descriptionThis EPD covers the DucoGrille Classic 130 HP and DucoGrille 60 HP, which belong to the same product family. Both variants are manufactured using identical materials, surface treatments, and production processes. The primary difference lies in the blade geometry, resulting in different aluminium mass per unit area. The DucoGrille Classic 130 HP is selected as the representative product for this study, as it exhibits the highest material intensity and environmental impacts within the product group and is therefore considered a conservative (worst-case) configuration for the declaration. These products are high-performance fixed aluminium louvre Grille, developed and produced by Duco Ventilation & Sun Control NV in Veurne, Belgium. These are part of the DucoGrille range of architectural ventilation components designed for natural air supply and exhaust in façades, doors, and walls.The Grille consists of extruded aluminium profiles (EN AW 6063 T66) with a frame depth of 130 mm and aerodynamically optimised blades that provide high airflow capacity combined with effective rainwater rejection. The assembly is performed with corrosion-resistant fasteners and finished with powder coating. The product contributes to: • Improved indoor air quality through natural ventilation • Energy efficiency by reducing the need for mechanical ventilation • Architectural integration through customisable design and finishes These products are intended for external building applications and is suitable for use in both new construction and renovation projects. The Grille is non-load bearing and must be installed in accordance with Duco’s installation guidelines. It is suitable for temperate climates and buildings with natural or hybrid ventilation systems. Manufacturing process (summary): 1. Extrusion of aluminium profiles (EN AW 6063 T66) 2. Cutting, machining, and assembly of frames and blades 3. Surface finishing via powder coating or anodizing 4. Quality control and packaging for shipment Technical performance: • Airflow characteristics determined according to EN 13030 • Acoustic performance tested according to ISO 10140, where applicable Reference service life: 50 years under normal operating and maintenance conditions. At end-of-life, the aluminium components are 100% recyclable
Technical purpose of productVentilation louvre grille
Manufacturing or service provision descriptionThese products are intended for external building applications and is suitable for use in both new construction and renovation projects. The Grille is non-load bearing and must be installed in accordance with Duco’s installation guidelines. It is suitable for temperate climates and buildings with natural or hybrid ventilation systems. Manufacturing process (summary): 1. Extrusion of aluminium profiles (EN AW 6063 T66) 2. Cutting, machining, and assembly of frames and blades 3. Surface finishing via powder coating or anodizing 4. Quality control and packaging for shipment
Material propertiesArea density: 35.46 kg/m2 Thickness: 0.13 m
Area density:
35.46 kg/m2
Thickness:
0.13 m
Manufacturing siteDuco Ventilation & Sun Control Duco Projects Bedrijvenlaan 2 8630 Veurne Belgium
UN CPC code41532. Bars, rods and profiles, of aluminium
Geographical scopeEurope
Actual or technical lifespan50 year(s)

Product images

Content declaration

Content declaration of multiple productsThe declared products are custom-dimension ventilation grilles. As environmental impacts scale linearly with area, the declared results can be scaled to any installed dimension by multiplying the declared results by the actual product area in m². Product variation within the product group was assessed based on the range of products sold during the reporting year. The largest product sold represents 262% of the declared representative unit
Hazardous and toxic substancesThe product does not contain any substances from the SVHC candidate list in concentrations exceeding 0.1% of its weight.
Product content
Content nameMass, kgPost-consumer recycled material, mass-% of productBiogenic material, mass-% of productBiogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Aluminium33.74800
Polyester Powder0.75000
Polyamide0.516000
Rubber0.121000
Steel0.331000
Total35.4184800
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2
Packaging materials
Material nameMass, kgMass-% (versus the product)Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Cardboard0.99730.419
Wooden package7.61213.4
PE foil0.042200
Total8.6492243.819
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2

Best-case product

Product nameDucoGrille Classic 130HP - 1 m2
Hazardous and toxic substancesThe product does not contain any substances from the SVHC candidate list in concentrations exceeding 0.1% of its weight.
Product content
Content nameMass, kgPost-consumer recycled material, mass-% of productBiogenic material, mass-% of productBiogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
DucoGrille 130HP 1 m235.464800
Total35.464800
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2
Packaging materials
Material nameMass, kgMass-% (versus the product)Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Packaging8.65243.82
Total8.65243.82
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2

Worst-case product

Product nameDucoGrille Classic 130HP - 3.62 m2
Hazardous and toxic substancesThe product does not contain any substances from the SVHC candidate list in concentrations exceeding 0.1% of its weight.
Product content
Content nameMass, kgPost-consumer recycled material, mass-% of productBiogenic material, mass-% of productBiogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
DucoGrille 130HP - 3.62 m2128.54800
Total128.54800
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2
Packaging materials
Material nameMass, kgMass-% (versus the product)Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Packaging31.12413.8
Total31.12413.8
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2

LCA information

EPD based on declared or functional unitDeclared unit
Declared unit and reference flowVentilation louvre grille Area: 1 m2
Conversion factor to mass1
Are infrastructure or capital goods included in any upstream, core or downstream processes?
Do infrastructure and capital goods contribute more than 10% to the A1-A3 (A1-A5 for services) results of any environmental impact indicator declared in the EPD?
Datasources used for this EPDecoinvent database (general) ecoinvent 3.8 database
LCA SoftwareSimaPro 9.6
Additional information about the underlying LCA-based information

The declared unit is 1 piece of installed ventilation/sun control system with 35,46 kg (covering 1 m2) for DucoGrille Classic 130HP (representative product) over the reference service life, including the frame and louvre elements, as produced and installed in the façade.

The declared unit represents the product provision of natural ventilation and external air intake/exhaust through a fixed aluminium louvre system with rain protection over the reference service life of the building component. Environmental impacts are reported for all the considered life-cycle stages defined in the EPD, per 1 m² of finished product delivered to the construction site.

Although DucoGrille Classic systems are marketed and sold in larger façade assemblies, 1 m² piece can be used as a linear parameterised unit to allow scaling to project-specific dimensions.

Note: The DucoGrille 60 HP variant is included within the same product group, sharing identical materials and manufacturing processes. Differences between the variants are limited to geometric configuration and resulting mass per unit area.

Time representativeness:

Manufacturer specific data have been collected for the year 2021. Although the dataset is from 2021, it remains valid representative for 2024 because all key factors affecting environmental performance—raw materials, suppliers, energy mix, and manufacturing processes—have not changed. The secondary data are modelled based on Ecoinvent 3.8 (2021) and Industry 2.0 (2022).

Geographical scope:

The DucoGrille Classic 130 HP is manufactured in Belgium, and this Environmental Product Declaration is intended for the United Kingdom market. Accordingly, the transport, installation, and end-of-life scenarios have been modelled based on conditions relevant to the UK.

Database(s) and LCA software used:

The modelling is done using the Quadrant LCA tool from Enperas NV, coupled with Simapro 9.0.6.1. The Ecoinvent 3.8 (2021) and Industry 2.0 (2022) databases, and the EN 15804+A2 methodology reference based on EF 3.1 have been used. The assessment results indicate that the overall data quality is adequate, with scores ranging on average from 2 to 2.5 (Good to Fair), considering geographical, technical, and temporal representativeness.

Version of the EN 15804 reference packageEF Reference Package 3.1
Characterisation methodsEN15804+A2+EF3.1
Technology description including background systemThis EPD covers the DucoGrille Classic 130 HP and DucoGrille 60 HP, which belong to the same product family. Both variants are manufactured using identical materials, surface treatments, and production processes. The primary difference lies in the blade geometry, resulting in different aluminium mass per unit area. The DucoGrille Classic 130 HP is selected as the representative product for this study, as it exhibits the highest material intensity and environmental impacts within the product group and is therefore considered a conservative (worst-case) configuration for the declaration. These products are high-performance fixed aluminium louvre Grille, developed and produced by Duco Ventilation & Sun Control NV in Veurne, Belgium. These are part of the DucoGrille range of architectural ventilation components designed for natural air supply and exhaust in façades, doors, and walls.The Grille consists of extruded aluminium profiles (EN AW 6063 T66) with a frame depth of 130 mm and aerodynamically optimised blades that provide high airflow capacity combined with effective rainwater rejection. The assembly is performed with corrosion-resistant fasteners and finished with powder coating. The product contributes to: • Improved indoor air quality through natural ventilation • Energy efficiency by reducing the need for mechanical ventilation • Architectural integration through customisable design and finishes These products are intended for external building applications and is suitable for use in both new construction and renovation projects. The Grille is non-load bearing and must be installed in accordance with Duco’s installation guidelines. It is suitable for temperate climates and buildings with natural or hybrid ventilation systems. Manufacturing process (summary): 1. Extrusion of aluminium profiles (EN AW 6063 T66) 2. Cutting, machining, and assembly of frames and blades 3. Surface finishing via powder coating or anodizing 4. Quality control and packaging for shipment Technical performance: • Airflow characteristics determined according to EN 13030 • Acoustic performance tested according to ISO 10140, where applicable Reference service life: 50 years under normal operating and maintenance conditions. At end-of-life, the aluminium components are 100% recyclable
Scrap (recycled material) inputs contribution levelMore than 10% of the GWP-GHG results in modules A1-A3 come from scrap inputs
Scrap (recycled material) inputs data
Material scrap nameMaterial scrap value
Aluminium scrap - post consumer732, kg CO2 eq./tonne
Aluminium scrap - pre consumer496, kg CO2 eq./tonne
The share of the total scrap input that was assumed to come with an environmental burden48%

Data quality assessment

Description of data quality assessment and reference yearsThe share of primary data used in this study is 18%. The foreground data, originating from 2021, remain representative as no significant changes have occurred in raw material sourcing, product composition, energy mix, or manufacturing processes. Therefore, the data accurately reflect current production conditions for DucoGrille products and comply with the requirement that foreground data should be less than 5 years old at the time of EPD publication. The primary data consists of the energy consumed in the manufacturing process, and the transport data used to model the transportation of the final products from the production plant to the installation. Background data are based on Ecoinvent 3.8. To ensure data quality of ecoinvent 3.8, key datasets (aluminium and electricity) were compared with the latest ecoinvent 3.11. The 3.8 data is considered conservative, generally showing higher impacts across most categories. The impacts related to the capital goods, are included in the background dataset from the ecoinvent database, by including the “infrastructure“ related emissions, and the impacts related to the foreground data is considered negligible.
Data quality assessment
Process nameSource typeSourceReference yearData categoryShare of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A3
Polyester coatingSupplier EPDEPD owner<5 years oldPrimary data2%
Electricity for manufacturingDatabaseecoinvent 3.8 <5 years old Primary data5%
Heat for manufacturingDatabase ecoinvent 3.8 <5 years old Primary data9%
Transport of productDatabase ecoinvent 3.8 <5 years old Primary data2%
Total share of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A318%
The share of primary data is calculated based on GWP-GHG results. It is a simplified indicator for data quality that supports the use of more primary data to increase the representativeness of and comparability between EPDs. Note that the indicator does not capture all relevant aspects of data quality and is not comparable across product categories.
Electricity data
Electricity used in the manufacturing process in A3 (A5 for services)
Type of electricity mixResidual electricity mix on the market
Energy sourcesHydro1.5%
Wind8.4%
Solar0%
Biomass0%
Geothermal0%
Waste0%
Nuclear33%
Natural gas14%
Coal0%
Oil0%
Peat0%
Other43.1%
GWP-GHG intensity (kg CO2 eq./kWh)0.26 kg CO2 eq./kWh
Method used to calculate residual electricity mixThe Belgian medium voltage average grid mix was used as it represents the actual electricity supply conditions for the manufacturing site and reflects the physical electricity consumed during production. Although the calculated residual mix shows lower GHG values, the average grid mix provides a more representative and conservative approach for modelling electricity use in the EPD.

System boundary

Description of the system boundaryb) Cradle to gate with options, modules C1-C4, module D and with optional modules (A1-A3 + C + D and additional modules).
Excluded modulesYes, there is an excluded module, or there are excluded modules
Justification for the omission of modulesThe louvre system is a passive façade component that does not require operational energy or water during use. Due to the corrosion-resistant aluminium construction and durable surface finish, no maintenance, repair, replacement, or refurbishment is required within the reference service life. Also, the cleaning requirements are specific to different use cases, and there is no standardization possible. Therefore, modules B1–B7 are considered not relevant and are excluded from the system boundary.

Declared modules

Product stageConstruction process stageUse stageEnd of life stageBeyond product life cycle
Raw material supplyTransportManufacturingTransport to siteConstruction installationUseMaintenanceRepairReplacementRefurbishmentOperational energy useOperational water useDe-construction demolitionTransportWaste processingDisposalReuse-Recovery-Recycling-potential
ModuleA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Modules declaredXXXXXNDNDNDNDNDNDNDXXXXX
GeographyBelgiumEuropeBelgiumUnited KingdomUnited KingdomN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomEurope
Share of specific data18%--------------
Variation - products262%--------------
Variation - sites0%--------------
DisclaimerThe share of specific/primary data and both variations (products and sites) refer to GWP-GHG results only.

Process flow diagram(s) related images

Default scenario

Name of the default scenarioDefault scenario
Description of the default scenarioIn the default end-of-life (EoL) scenario, all components are assumed to undergo sorting prior to treatment. Aluminium parts, including coatings, are primarily directed to recycling, with 96% recycled and the remaining 4% sent to landfill. Rubber and plastic parts are assumed to be fully incinerated, with 100% allocated to incineration and no material recovery or reuse. Steel parts are almost entirely recycled, with 99% sent for recycling and only 1% disposed of in landfill. No reuse is considered for any of the components in this scenario.

Module A4: Transport to the building site

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module A4Module A4
Brief description of the default scenario in module A4600 km by EURO6 lorry and 100 km shipping from Belgium to the UK
Description of the default scenario in module A4A 600 km transport by truck Transport, freight, lorry 16-32 metric ton, EURO6 {RER}| transport, freight, lorry 16-32 metric ton, EURO6 | Cut-off, U has been assumed from the manufacturer to the installation site. In addition, a 100 km shipping between Belgium to the UK has been accounted.
Module A4 informationValueUnit
Distance
600 km by truck and 100 km Shipping
km
Capacity utilization (including empty returns)
Euro 6 trucks with a 37% utilization capacity, and Transocianic ship with load capacity 43000 ton IMO size class
N/A
Bulk density of transported products
Not calculated
N/A
Volume capacity utilization factor
(factor: =1 or <1 or ≥1 for compressed or
nested packaged products)
1
Dimensionless
Fuel type and consumption of vehicle or vehicle type used for transport Ecoinvent 3.8 data; 0.043 l/tkm for Euro 6, 16-32t diesel truck; 0.026 l/tkm heavy fuel oil for the freight ship
N/A

Module A5: Installation in the building

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module A5Module A5
Brief description of the default scenario in module A5Energy consumption for deconstruction
Description of the default scenario in module A5For the installation 0,012 kWh/m2 electricity has been used. Also, the packaging waste generated from the product is accounted for in this module. The end of life treatment of the packaging are modelled.
Module A5 informationValueUnit
Net fresh water consumption during installation
0
m3
Electricity for installation machines0.012
kWh

Module C: End-of-life

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module CModule C1-C4
Brief description of the default scenario in module CDeconstruction and end of life treatment of the product
Description of the default scenario in module CModule C1 addresses the impacts associated with the dismantling of the product at the end-of-life, and it is modelled to have the same amount of energy consumption as in A5. Module C2 accounts for the transport of waste generated at the product’s end-of-life to final treatment. As actual transport distances are unknown at product level, representative UK waste management scenarios were applied in accordance with EN 15804+A2:2019. The following average transport distances were assumed: • 30 km from demolition site to sorting/transfer facility • 50 km from sorting facility to landfill • 100 km to incineration with energy recovery • 200 km to recycling These distances represent typical UK end-of-life routes and comply with the scenario-based modelling approach required by EN 15804+A2 Module C3 covers the waste processing activities, including reuse, recovery, and recycling. It is assumed that major part of the metal components (96% aluminium and 99% steel) go to recycling, and the rest is landfilled. These materials are considered to have reached the end-of-waste status after sorting and are cut-off from the system boundary beyond this point. The plastic components are sorted and sent for a conservative 100% incineration scenario. The table below shows the amount of materials destined for different treatment. The declared end-of-life (EoL) treatment scenario is based mainly on the PEFCR scenarios (2020) for the different materials at the EoL. As this scenario represents a mix of different possible treatment options, the corresponding 100% scenarios (i.e. recycling, reuse, incineration and landfill) are formulated and the results are given as additional information to enable end users to calculate case-specific EoL results. The scenarios are as follows - 100% recycling - 100% reuse - 100% Incineration with energy recovery - 100% landfill The description and the results of these scenarios are given in the additional results section. In module C4, the remaining metals are directed to landfill. The residual plastic fraction is sorted and sent to incineration and disposal. The efficiency of the incineration process is assumed to be less than 60%.
Module C informationValueUnit
Waste collected seperately35.5
kg
Destined to recycling33.1
kg
Destined to energy recover0.63
kg
Destined to landfill1.74
kg

Reference service life

Description of the default scenario in reference service lifeReference service life of 50 years under normal operating and maintenance conditions has been declared. However, the use phase is not considered in this declaration.
Reference service life informationValueUnit
Reference service life
50
year(s)

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module DModule D
Brief description of the default scenario in module DBenefits and burdens beyond the boundary
Description of the default scenario in module DThis module accounts for the benefits and burdens associated with the recycling of packaging materials (from Module A5) and end-of-life materials (from Module C3), which occur beyond the system boundary. It also includes the benefits from energy recovery through the incineration of both product packaging and end-of-life components.

Additional scenario 1

Name of the additional scenario100% Recycling
Description of the additional scenarioIn addition to the default end-of-life scenario, which is a mix of different treatment options, the additional scenarios provide better transparency and decision-making support. In this scenario, all EoL materials are sent for sorting (C3) and recycling. After the sorting process, these materials are considered to have achieved the end-of-waste status. Module D has both the credits from the recycling of the EoL materials and the treatment of packaging of the final product from A5.

Module A4: Transport to the building site

Description of the additional scenario in module A4A 600 km transport by truck Transport, freight, lorry 16-32 metric ton, EURO6 {RER}| transport, freight, lorry 16-32 metric ton, EURO6 | Cut-off, U has been assumed from the manufacturer to the installation site. In addition, a 100 km shipping between Belgium to the UK has been accounted.
Module A4 informationValueUnit
Distance
600 km by truck and 100 km Shipping
km
Capacity utilization (including empty returns)
Euro 6 trucks with a 37% utilization capacity, and Transocianic ship with load capacity 43000 ton IMO size class
N/A
Bulk density of transported products
Not calculated
N/A
Volume capacity utilization factor
(factor: =1 or <1 or ≥1 for compressed or
nested packaged products)
1
Dimensionless
Fuel type and consumption of vehicle or vehicle type used for transport Ecoinvent 3.8 data; 0.043 l/tkm for Euro 6, 16-32t diesel truck; 0.026 l/tkm heavy fuel oil for the freight ship

Module A5: Installation in the building

Description of the additional scenario in module A5For the installation 0,012 kWh/m2 electricity has been used. Also, the packaging waste generated from the product is accounted for in this module. The end of life treatment of the packaging are modelled.
Module A5 informationValueUnit
Net fresh water consumption during installation
0
m3
Electricity for installation machines0.012
kWh

Module C: End-of-life

Description of the additional scenario in module CModule C1 addresses the impacts associated with the dismantling of the product at the end-of-life, and it is modelled to have the same amount of energy consumption as in A5. Module C2 accounts for the transport of waste generated at the product’s end-of-life to final treatment. As actual transport distances are unknown at product level, representative UK waste management scenarios were applied in accordance with EN 15804+A2:2019. The following average transport distances were assumed: • 30 km from demolition site to sorting/transfer facility • 200 km to recycling These distances represent typical UK end-of-life routes and comply with the scenario-based modelling approach required by EN 15804+A2 Module C3 covers the waste processing activities, that is 100% recycling of the EoL product. In module C4, has no impact as all of of the product is recycled.
Module C informationValueUnit
Waste collected seperately35.5
kg
Destined to recycling35.5
kg

Reference service life

Description of the additional scenario in reference service lifeReference service life of 50 years under normal operating and maintenance conditions has been declared. However, the use phase is not considered in this declaration.
Reference service life informationValueUnit
Reference service life
50
year(s)

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Description of the additional scenario in module DThis module accounts for the benefits and burdens associated with the recycling of packaging materials (from Module A5) and end-of-life materials (from Module C3), which occur beyond the system boundary. It also includes the benefits from energy recovery through the incineration of both product packaging and end-of-life components, depending on the scenario output.

Additional scenario 2

Name of the additional scenario100% Reuse
Description of the additional scenarioIn this scenario, the EoL materials are assumed to be sent for reuse. The environmental credit for the avoided material in Module D is modelled as the negative impacts of modules A1 for the corresponding primary material, accounting production losses.

Module A4: Transport to the building site

Description of the additional scenario in module A4A 600 km transport by truck Transport, freight, lorry 16-32 metric ton, EURO6 {RER}| transport, freight, lorry 16-32 metric ton, EURO6 | Cut-off, U has been assumed from the manufacturer to the installation site. In addition, a 100 km shipping between Belgium to the UK has been accounted.
Module A4 informationValueUnit
Distance
600 km by truck and 100 km Shipping
km
Capacity utilization (including empty returns)
Euro 6 trucks with a 37% utilization capacity, and Transocianic ship with load capacity 43000 ton IMO size class
N/A
Bulk density of transported products
Not calculated
N/A
Volume capacity utilization factor
(factor: =1 or <1 or ≥1 for compressed or
nested packaged products)
1
Dimensionless
Fuel type and consumption of vehicle or vehicle type used for transport Ecoinvent 3.8 data; 0.043 l/tkm for Euro 6, 16-32t diesel truck; 0.026 l/tkm heavy fuel oil for the freight ship

Module A5: Installation in the building

Description of the additional scenario in module A5For the installation 0,012 kWh/m2 electricity has been used. Also, the packaging waste generated from the product is accounted for in this module. The end of life treatment of the packaging are modelled.
Module A5 informationValueUnit
Net fresh water consumption during installation
0
m3
Electricity for installation machines0.012
kWh

Module C: End-of-life

Description of the additional scenario in module CModule C1 addresses the impacts associated with the dismantling of the product at the end-of-life, and it is modelled to have the same amount of energy consumption as in A5. Module C2 accounts for the transport of waste generated at the product’s end-of-life to final treatment. As actual transport distances are unknown at product level, representative UK waste management scenarios were applied in accordance with EN 15804+A2:2019. The following average transport distances were assumed: • 30 km from demolition site to sorting/transfer facility • 200 km to reuse These distances represent typical UK end-of-life routes and comply with the scenario-based modelling approach required by EN 15804+A2 Module C3 covers the waste processing activities, that is the sorting of the 100% reusable EoL product. There is no impact in module C4.
Module C informationValueUnit
Waste collected seperately35.5
kg
Destined to reuse35.5
kg

Reference service life

Description of the additional scenario in reference service lifeReference service life of 50 years under normal operating and maintenance conditions has been declared. However, the use phase is not considered in this declaration.
Reference service life informationValueUnit
Reference service life
50
year(s)

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Description of the additional scenario in module DThis module accounts for the benefits and burdens associated with the recycling of packaging materials (from Module A5) and end-of-life materials (from Module C3), which occur beyond the system boundary. It also includes the benefits from energy recovery through the incineration of both product packaging and end-of-life components, depending on the scenario output in C3 and C4.

Additional scenario 3

Name of the additional scenario100% Incineration with energy recovery
Description of the additional scenarioIn this scenario, the incineration is accounted with energy recovery in form of electricity and heat. The emissions from the incineration process are attributed to module C3, and the benefits of the avoided energy production due to the recovery is accounted in module D. For the energy recovery, conservative efficiencies of 20% and 10% have been assumed for heat and electricity respectively.

Module A4: Transport to the building site

Description of the additional scenario in module A4A 600 km transport by truck Transport, freight, lorry 16-32 metric ton, EURO6 {RER}| transport, freight, lorry 16-32 metric ton, EURO6 | Cut-off, U has been assumed from the manufacturer to the installation site. In addition, a 100 km shipping between Belgium to the UK has been accounted.
Module A4 informationValueUnit
Distance
600 km by truck and 100 km Shipping
km
Capacity utilization (including empty returns)
Euro 6 trucks with a 37% utilization capacity, and Transocianic ship with load capacity 43000 ton IMO size class
N/A
Bulk density of transported products
Not calculated
N/A
Volume capacity utilization factor
(factor: =1 or <1 or ≥1 for compressed or
nested packaged products)
1
Dimensionless
Fuel type and consumption of vehicle or vehicle type used for transport Ecoinvent 3.8 data; 0.043 l/tkm for Euro 6, 16-32t diesel truck; 0.026 l/tkm heavy fuel oil for the freight ship

Module A5: Installation in the building

Description of the additional scenario in module A5For the installation 0,012 kWh/m2 electricity has been used. Also, the packaging waste generated from the product is accounted for in this module. The end of life treatment of the packaging are modelled.
Module A5 informationValueUnit
Net fresh water consumption during installation
0
m3
Electricity for installation machines0.012
kWh

Module C: End-of-life

Description of the additional scenario in module CModule C1 addresses the impacts associated with the dismantling of the product at the end-of-life, and it is modelled to have the same amount of energy consumption as in A5. Module C2 accounts for the transport of waste generated at the product’s end-of-life to final treatment. As actual transport distances are unknown at product level, representative UK waste management scenarios were applied in accordance with EN 15804+A2:2019. The following average transport distances were assumed: • 30 km from demolition site to sorting/transfer facility • 100 km to energy recovery These distances represent typical UK end-of-life routes and comply with the scenario-based modelling approach required by EN 15804+A2 Module C3 covers the waste processing activities, that is the incineration and energy recovery of the EoL product. There is no impact in module C4.
Module C informationValueUnit
Waste collected seperately35.5
kg
Destined to reuse35.5
kg

Reference service life

Description of the additional scenario in reference service lifeReference service life of 50 years under normal operating and maintenance conditions has been declared. However, the use phase is not considered in this declaration.
Reference service life informationValueUnit
Reference service life
50
year(s)

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Description of the additional scenario in module DThis module accounts for the benefits and burdens associated with the recycling of packaging materials (from Module A5) and end-of-life materials (from Module C3), which occur beyond the system boundary. It also includes the benefits from energy recovery through the incineration of both product packaging and end-of-life components, depending on the scenario output in C3 and C4.

Additional scenario 4

Name of the additional scenario100% Landfill
Description of the additional scenarioIn this scenario, all the EoL materials are sent to landfill. The credits in module D corresponds to the credits from the EoL treatment of the packaging in A5.

Module A4: Transport to the building site

Description of the additional scenario in module A4A 600 km transport by truck Transport, freight, lorry 16-32 metric ton, EURO6 {RER}| transport, freight, lorry 16-32 metric ton, EURO6 | Cut-off, U has been assumed from the manufacturer to the installation site. In addition, a 100 km shipping between Belgium to the UK has been accounted.
Module A4 informationValueUnit
Distance
600 km by truck and 100 km Shipping
km
Capacity utilization (including empty returns)
Euro 6 trucks with a 37% utilization capacity, and Transocianic ship with load capacity 43000 ton IMO size class
N/A
Bulk density of transported products
Not calculated
N/A
Volume capacity utilization factor
(factor: =1 or <1 or ≥1 for compressed or
nested packaged products)
1
Dimensionless
Fuel type and consumption of vehicle or vehicle type used for transport Ecoinvent 3.8 data; 0.043 l/tkm for Euro 6, 16-32t diesel truck; 0.026 l/tkm heavy fuel oil for the freight ship

Module A5: Installation in the building

Description of the additional scenario in module A5For the installation 0,012 kWh/m2 electricity has been used. Also, the packaging waste generated from the product is accounted for in this module. The end of life treatment of the packaging are modelled.
Module A5 informationValueUnit
Net fresh water consumption during installation
0
m3
Electricity for installation machines0.012
kWh

Module C: End-of-life

Description of the additional scenario in module CModule C1 addresses the impacts associated with the dismantling of the product at the end-of-life, and it is modelled to have the same amount of energy consumption as in A5. Module C2 accounts for the transport of waste generated at the product’s end-of-life to final treatment. As actual transport distances are unknown at product level, representative UK waste management scenarios were applied in accordance with EN 15804+A2:2019. The following average transport distances were assumed: • 30 km from demolition site to sorting/transfer facility • 50 km to landfill These distances represent typical UK end-of-life routes and comply with the scenario-based modelling approach required by EN 15804+A2 Module C3 has no impacts. Module C4 accounts the impacts of the sanitary landfilling of the EoL materials.
Module C informationValueUnit
Waste collected seperately35.5
kg
Destined to reuse35.5
kg

Reference service life

Description of the additional scenario in reference service lifeReference service life of 50 years under normal operating and maintenance conditions has been declared. However, the use phase is not considered in this declaration.
Reference service life informationValueUnit
Reference service life
50
year(s)

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Description of the additional scenario in module DThis module accounts for the benefits and burdens associated with the recycling of packaging materials (from Module A5) and end-of-life materials (from Module C3), which occur beyond the system boundary. It also includes the benefits from energy recovery through the incineration of both product packaging and end-of-life components, depending on the scenario output in C3 and C4.

Environmental performance

The estimated impact results are only relative statements, which do not indicate the endpoints of the impact categories, exceeding threshold values, safety margins and/or risks.

Mandatory environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - totalGWP-totalkg CO2 eq.1.73E+24.31E+01.54E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.81E-31.28E+03.57E+00.00E+0-6.89E+1
Climate change - fossilGWP-fossilkg CO2 eq.1.83E+24.31E+02.26E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.80E-31.28E+03.25E+00.00E+0-6.29E+1
Climate change - biogenicGWP-biogenickg CO2 eq.-1.18E+11.54E-31.31E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.93E-64.56E-42.95E-10.00E+0-4.86E+0
Climate change - land use and land-use changeGWP-luluckg CO2 eq.1.77E+01.72E-31.79E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND5.24E-65.10E-49.35E-40.00E+0-1.15E+0
Ozone depletionODPkg CFC-11 eq.1.60E-59.99E-72.42E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.61E-102.95E-71.35E-70.00E+0-4.80E-6
AcidificationAPmol H+ eq.1.23E+01.22E-21.42E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.33E-53.62E-36.25E-30.00E+0-4.23E-1
Eutrophication aquatic freshwaterEP-freshwaterkg P eq.8.20E-33.07E-58.64E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND8.15E-89.09E-63.38E-50.00E+0-2.51E-3
Eutrophication aquatic marineEP-marinekg N eq.1.59E-12.43E-32.34E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.65E-67.20E-41.98E-30.00E+0-5.54E-2
Eutrophication terrestrialEP-terrestrialmol N eq.1.80E+02.71E-22.53E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.20E-58.02E-31.94E-20.00E+0-6.11E-1
Photochemical ozone formationPOCPkg NMVOC eq.5.64E-11.04E-27.88E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND7.94E-63.08E-35.35E-30.00E+0-2.04E-1
Depletion of abiotic resources - minerals and metalsADP-minerals&metals1, 2kg Sb eq.3.40E-31.17E-53.51E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.54E-83.45E-61.57E-50.00E+06.14E-4
Depletion of abiotic resources - fossil fuelsADP-fossil1MJ, net calorific value2.76E+36.53E+13.34E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND9.98E-21.93E+11.21E+10.00E+0-8.00E+2
Water useWDP1m3 world eq. deprived6.07E+11.99E-16.37E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.19E-45.88E-23.01E-10.00E+0-1.26E+1
AcronymsGWP-fossil = Global Warming Potential fossil fuels; GWP-biogenic = Global Warming Potential biogenic; GWP-luluc = Global Warming Potential land use and land use change; ODP = Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer; AP = Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance; EP-freshwater = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching freshwater end compartment; EP-marine = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching marine end compartment; EP-terrestrial = Eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance; POCP = Formation potential of tropospheric ozone; ADP-minerals&metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources; ADP-fossil = Abiotic depletion for fossil resources potential; WDP = Water (user) deprivation potential, deprivation-weighted water consumption
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator
Disclaimer 2The results of the impact categories abiotic depletion of minerals and metals may be highly uncertain in LCAs that include capital goods/infrastructure in generic datasets, in case infrastructure/capital goods contribute greatly to the total results. This is because the LCI data of infrastructure/capital goods used to quantify these indicators in currently available generic datasets sometimes lack temporal, technological and geographical representativeness. Caution should be exercised when using the results of these indicators for decision-making purposes.

Additional mandatory environmental performance indicators

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - GWP-GHGGWP-GHG1kg CO2 eq.1.83E+24.31E+02.26E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.80E-31.28E+03.25E+00.00E+0-6.29E+1
AcronymsGWP-GHG = Global warming potential greenhouse gas.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The GWP-GHG indicator is termed GWP-IOBC/GHG in the ILCD+EPD+ data format. The indicator accounts for all greenhouse gases except biogenic carbon dioxide uptake and emissions and biogenic carbon stored in the product. As such, the indicator is identical to GWP-total except that the CF for biogenic CO2 is set to zero.

Additional voluntary environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Particulate matter emissionsPMDisease incidence1.11E-53.46E-71.49E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND5.76E-111.02E-79.13E-80.00E+0-4.94E-6
Ionizing radiation - human healthIRP1kBq U235 eq.1.34E+12.84E-11.61E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.74E-38.39E-26.40E-20.00E+0-3.47E+0
Eco-toxicity - freshwaterETP-fw2, 3CTUe5.22E+35.13E+16.84E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND5.83E-21.52E+11.12E+30.00E+0-1.05E+3
Human toxicity - cancer effectsHTP-c2, 3CTUh3.61E-71.65E-94.42E-9NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.59E-124.88E-101.87E-90.00E+0-1.51E-7
Human toxicity - non-cancer effectsHTP-nc2, 3CTUh7.81E-65.18E-88.48E-8NDNDNDNDNDNDND4.57E-111.53E-83.51E-80.00E+0-1.75E-6
Land-use related impacts/soil qualitySQP2, 3Dimensionless2.94E+34.55E+13.50E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND4.41E-21.35E+13.57E+10.00E+0-5.62E+2
AcronymsPM = Potential incidence of disease due to particulate matter emissions; IRP = Potential human exposure efficiency relative to U235; ETP-fw = Potential comparative toxic unit for ecosystems; HTP-c = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; HTP-nc = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; SQP = Potential soil quality index.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
Disclaimer 2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator.
Disclaimer 3The results of the impact categories land use, human toxicity (cancer), human toxicity, noncancer and ecotoxicity (freshwater) may be highly uncertain in LCAs that include capital goods/infrastructure in generic datasets, in case infrastructure/capital goods contribute greatly to the total results. This is because the LCI data of infrastructure/capital goods used to quantify these indicators in currently available generic datasets sometimes lack temporal, technological and geographical representativeness. Caution should be exercised when using the results of these indicators for decision-making purposes.

Resource use indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
PEREMJ, net calorific value8.66E+23.60E-13.87E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.09E-22.72E-11.20E+00.00E+00.00E+0
PERMMJ, net calorific value1.22E+20.00E+0-7.24E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
PERTMJ, net calorific value9.88E+29.19E-1-3.37E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.09E-22.72E-11.20E+00.00E+00.00E+0
PENREMJ, net calorific value2.77E+32.58E+13.40E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.10E-11.94E+15.61E+10.00E+00.00E+0
PENRMMJ, net calorific value4.45E+10.00E+0-6.24E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+0-4.27E+10.00E+00.00E+0
PENRTMJ, net calorific value2.82E+36.57E+13.38E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.10E-11.94E+11.34E+10.00E+00.00E+0
SMkg2.82E+10.00E+02.82E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+09.61E+0
RSFMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
NRSFMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
FWm33.91E+04.81E-34.17E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.90E-51.42E-31.90E-20.00E+0-1.38E+0
AcronymsPERE = Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERM = Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERT = Total use of renewable primary energy resources; PENRE = Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRM = Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRT = Total use of non-renewable primary energy re-sources; SM = Use of secondary material; RSF = Use of renewable secondary fuels; NRSF = Use of non-renewable secondary fuels; FW = Use of net fresh water.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Waste indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
HWDkg2.52E-11.71E-42.54E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND8.97E-85.05E-54.84E-50.00E+01.75E-2
NHWDkg4.51E+13.42E+04.21E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.74E-41.01E+03.36E+00.00E+0-1.86E+1
RWDkg1.25E-24.42E-41.64E-4NDNDNDNDNDNDND8.73E-71.31E-47.41E-50.00E+0-3.94E-3
AcronymsHWD = Hazardous waste disposed; NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed; RWD = Radioactive waste disposed.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Output flow indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
CRUkg6.89E-10.00E+06.89E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
MFRkg1.84E+00.00E+03.38E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+03.31E+10.00E+00.00E+0
MERkg0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
EEEMJ, net calorific value5.32E+00.00E+06.17E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+08.55E+00.00E+00.00E+0
EETMJ, net calorific value2.66E+00.00E+03.08E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+04.27E+00.00E+00.00E+0
AcronymsCRU = Components for re-use; MFR = Materials for recycling; MER = Materials for energy recovery; EEE = Exported electrical energy; EET = Exported thermal energy.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4

Additional scenario100% Recycling
Description of the scenario/methodIn this scenario, all EoL materials are sent for sorting (C3) and recycling. After the sorting process, these materials are considered to have achieved the end-of-waste status. Module D has both the credits from the recycling of the EoL materials and the treatment of packaging of the final product from A5.
Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4
Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Global warming potential - total (GWP-total)GWP - totalkg CO2 eq.1.73E+24.31E+01.54E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.81E-31.33E+01.21E+00.00E+0-8.39E+1
Global warming potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)GWP - fossilkg CO2 eq.1.83E+24.31E+02.26E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.80E-31.33E+08.87E-10.00E+0-7.75E+1
Global warming potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)GWP - biogenickg CO2 eq.-1.18E+11.54E-31.31E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.93E-64.75E-42.95E-10.00E+0-4.93E+0
Global warming potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)GWP – luluckg CO2 eq.1.77E+01.72E-31.79E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND5.24E-65.31E-48.54E-40.00E+0-1.44E+0
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)ODPkg CFC 11 eq.1.60E-59.99E-72.42E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.61E-103.08E-71.04E-70.00E+0-5.90E-6
Acidification potential, accumulated exceedance (AP)APmol H+ eq.1.23E+01.22E-21.42E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.33E-53.77E-35.29E-30.00E+0-5.23E-1
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)EP - freshwaterkg P eq.8.20E-33.07E-58.64E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND8.15E-89.47E-63.11E-50.00E+0-3.05E-3
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)EP - marinekg N eq.1.59E-12.43E-32.34E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.65E-67.49E-41.64E-30.00E+0-6.85E-2
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)EP – terrestrialmol N eq.1.80E+02.71E-22.53E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.20E-58.35E-31.57E-20.00E+0-7.55E-1
Photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP)POCPkg NMVOC eq.5.64E-11.04E-27.88E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND7.94E-63.21E-34.35E-30.00E+0-2.53E-1
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)ADP – minerals&metalskg Sb eq.3.40E-31.17E-53.51E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.54E-83.60E-61.52E-50.00E+07.72E-4
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)ADP - fossilMJ2.76E+36.53E+13.34E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND9.98E-22.01E+11.05E+10.00E+0-9.84E+2
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)WDPm36.07E+11.99E-16.37E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.19E-46.13E-21.28E-10.00E+0-1.55E+1
Acronyms
Disclaimers
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4

Additional scenario100% Reuse
Description of the scenario/methodIn this scenario, the EoL materials are assumed to be sent for reuse. The environmental credit for the avoided material in Module D is modelled as the negative impacts of modules A1 for the corresponding primary material, accounting production losses.
Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4
Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Global warming potential - total (GWP-total)GWP - totalkg CO2 eq.1.73E+24.31E+01.54E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.81E-31.33E+01.21E+00.00E+0-1.58E+2
Global warming potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)GWP - fossilkg CO2 eq.1.83E+24.31E+02.26E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.80E-31.33E+08.87E-10.00E+0-1.51E+2
Global warming potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)GWP - biogenickg CO2 eq.-1.18E+11.54E-31.31E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.93E-64.75E-42.95E-10.00E+0-5.71E+0
Global warming potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)GWP – luluckg CO2 eq.1.77E+01.72E-31.79E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND5.24E-65.31E-48.54E-40.00E+0-1.72E+0
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)ODPkg CFC 11 eq.1.60E-59.99E-72.42E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.61E-103.08E-71.04E-70.00E+0-6.49E-3
Acidification potential, accumulated exceedance (AP)APmol H+ eq.1.23E+01.22E-21.42E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.33E-53.77E-35.29E-30.00E+0-1.15E+0
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)EP - freshwaterkg P eq.8.20E-33.07E-58.64E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND8.15E-89.47E-63.11E-50.00E+0-1.40E-2
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)EP - marinekg N eq.1.59E-12.43E-32.34E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.65E-67.49E-41.64E-30.00E+0-1.45E-1
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)EP – terrestrialmol N eq.1.80E+02.71E-22.53E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.20E-58.35E-31.57E-20.00E+0-1.59E+0
Photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP)POCPkg NMVOC eq.5.64E-11.04E-27.88E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND7.94E-63.21E-34.35E-30.00E+0-5.02E-1
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)ADP – minerals&metalskg Sb eq.3.40E-31.17E-53.51E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.54E-83.60E-61.52E-50.00E+0-9.68E-3
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)ADP - fossilMJ2.76E+36.53E+13.34E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND9.98E-22.01E+11.05E+10.00E+0-2.11E+3
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)WDPm36.07E+11.99E-16.37E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.19E-46.13E-21.28E-10.00E+0-5.59E+1
Acronyms
Disclaimers
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4

Additional scenario100% Landfill
Description of the scenario/methodIn this scenario, all the EoL materials are sent to landfill. The credits in module D corresponds to the credits from the EoL treatment of the packaging in A5.
Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4
Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Global warming potential - total (GWP-total)GWP - totalkg CO2 eq.1.73E+24.31E+01.54E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.81E-34.62E-11.77E+00.00E+0-5.76E+0
Global warming potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)GWP - fossilkg CO2 eq.1.83E+24.31E+02.26E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.80E-34.62E-11.44E+00.00E+0-1.15E+0
Global warming potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)GWP - biogenickg CO2 eq.-1.18E+11.54E-31.31E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.93E-61.65E-42.97E-10.00E+0-4.60E+0
Global warming potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)GWP – luluckg CO2 eq.1.77E+01.72E-31.79E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND5.24E-61.85E-41.01E-30.00E+0-5.66E-3
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)ODPkg CFC 11 eq.1.60E-59.99E-72.42E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.61E-101.07E-72.34E-70.00E+0-1.42E-7
Acidification potential, accumulated exceedance (AP)APmol H+ eq.1.23E+01.22E-21.42E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.33E-51.31E-39.00E-30.00E+0-5.36E-3
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)EP - freshwaterkg P eq.8.20E-33.07E-58.64E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND8.15E-83.29E-63.64E-50.00E+0-8.51E-5
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)EP - marinekg N eq.1.59E-12.43E-32.34E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.65E-62.61E-43.10E-30.00E+0-1.40E-3
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)EP – terrestrialmol N eq.1.80E+02.71E-22.53E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.20E-52.91E-33.12E-20.00E+0-1.54E-2
Photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP)POCPkg NMVOC eq.5.64E-11.04E-27.88E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND7.94E-61.12E-38.77E-30.00E+0-5.20E-3
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)ADP – minerals&metalskg Sb eq.3.40E-31.17E-53.51E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.54E-81.25E-61.67E-50.00E+0-3.18E-6
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)ADP - fossilMJ2.76E+36.53E+13.34E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND9.98E-27.00E+02.13E+10.00E+0-2.03E+1
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)WDPm36.07E+11.99E-16.37E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.19E-42.13E-21.95E-10.00E+0-7.21E-1
Acronyms
Disclaimers
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4

Additional scenario100% Incineration with energy recovery
Description of the scenario/methodHere, the incineration is accounted with energy recovery in form of electricity and heat. The emissions from the incineration process are attributed to module C3, and the benefits of the avoided energy production due to the recovery is accounted in module D. For the energy recovery, conservative efficiencies of 20% and 10% have been assumed for heat and electricity respectively.
Results for additional scenarios for modules A4-C4
Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Global warming potential - total (GWP-total)GWP - totalkg CO2 eq.1.73E+24.31E+01.54E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.81E-31.04E+04.03E+00.00E+0-5.84E+0
Global warming potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)GWP - fossilkg CO2 eq.1.83E+24.31E+02.26E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.80E-31.04E+03.70E+00.00E+0-1.24E+0
Global warming potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)GWP - biogenickg CO2 eq.-1.18E+11.54E-31.31E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.93E-63.72E-42.96E-10.00E+0-4.59E+0
Global warming potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)GWP – luluckg CO2 eq.1.77E+01.72E-31.79E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND5.24E-64.16E-41.29E-30.00E+0-4.96E-3
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)ODPkg CFC 11 eq.1.60E-59.99E-72.42E-7NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.61E-102.41E-72.40E-70.00E+0-1.81E-7
Acidification potential, accumulated exceedance (AP)APmol H+ eq.1.23E+01.22E-21.42E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.33E-52.95E-39.07E-30.00E+0-4.49E-3
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)EP - freshwaterkg P eq.8.20E-33.07E-58.64E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND8.15E-87.41E-64.09E-50.00E+0-5.37E-5
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)EP - marinekg N eq.1.59E-12.43E-32.34E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.65E-65.87E-42.89E-30.00E+0-1.35E-3
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)EP – terrestrialmol N eq.1.80E+02.71E-22.53E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.20E-56.54E-32.94E-20.00E+0-1.47E-2
Photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP)POCPkg NMVOC eq.5.64E-11.04E-27.88E-3NDNDNDNDNDNDND7.94E-62.51E-38.52E-30.00E+0-5.09E-3
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)ADP – minerals&metalskg Sb eq.3.40E-31.17E-53.51E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.54E-82.81E-61.69E-50.00E+0-4.19E-6
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)ADP - fossilMJ2.76E+36.53E+13.34E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDND9.98E-21.58E+12.05E+10.00E+0-3.53E+1
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)WDPm36.07E+11.99E-16.37E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.19E-44.80E-2-1.77E-20.00E+0-6.99E-1
Acronyms
Disclaimers
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Additional environmental information

Core Indicators variation due to different dimension

The variability has been assessed for DucoGrille products over an installed surface range from 1 m² to 3.62 m² during the reporting year. The declared unit (DU) is 1 m², representing the smallest and a representative installed area. The calculated variability shows a uniform increase of approximately 262% across all impact indicators, representing the upper range of possible product configurations. This variability does not indicate uncertainty in the LCA model but rather reflects the scaling between the declared unit (1 m²) and the largest configuration considered within the assessment.

This approach is included to comply with the requirements of the applicable c-PCR. It should be noted that DucoGrille 130HP (and 60HP) products are not manufactured as discrete, fixed-size units, but are produced as continuous, project-specific systems. As such, the concept of variability between predefined product sizes is not directly applicable.

Because the product design, material composition, and manufacturing processes remain consistent across all dimensions, environmental impacts scale linearly with surface area and mass. Therefore, the declared unit of 1 m² is representative, and results can be reliably extrapolated to other sizes. The reported 262% variability simply reflects this linear scaling to the maximum assessed configuration and does not imply any variation in environmental performance or composition.

Justification for why this is representativeDucoGrille Classic 130HP and 60HP are from the same product family, with identical materials and production; only the blade geometry differs. The 130HP has a higher aluminum mass per m² and therefore represents the highest environmental impacts (up to ~60% higher than 60HP). Also, DucoGrille Classic 130HP is produced in custom dimensions. A 1 m² product is chosen as the representative declared unit, as the material composition remains constant and environmental impacts scale linearly with the surface area.

Abbreviations

CEN - European Committee for Standardization

CLC - Co-location centre

CPC - Central product classification

EF - Environmental Footprint

EN - European Norm (Standard)

EPD - Environmental Product Declaration

EU - European Union

GHS - Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals

GPI - General Programme Instructions

GRI - Global Reporting Initiative

ISO - International Organization for Standardization

LCA - Life Cycle Assessment

LCI - Life Cycle Inventory

ND - Not Declared

RoHS - Restriction of Hazardous Substances

SVHC - Substances of Very High Concern

References

PCR 2019:14 – construction products (Version 2.0.1, published on 07-04-2025)

2019:14-c-PCR-018 Ventilation components (Adopted from EPD Norway)

Version history

Version 001, 2026-05-13