EPD-IES-0027227:002

Tubing and Profiles manufactured from steel scrap by T A 2000

C-Type and Z-Type Purlins These profiles are manufactured from galvanized and prepainted pickled hot -rolled sheet, which is bent into sections, generating a "C" or "Z" shape. They have high structural capacity and wide functionality, mainly recommended for the Construction industry. Square, Round, and Rectangular Tubes Hollow steel bars in rectangular, square, and round shapes. Structural steel profiles have outstanding strength, and are used in light structures such as support columns, roofs, and mezzanines. Their versatility allows for easy welding and cutting. Square Tube Square hollow steel profiles used to assemble structures that do not require large sizes or weights. Due to their square shape, they have greater strength and stiffness than steel angles or channels. Applicable to ASTM A513 standard. Round Tube Round steel tubes are used to assemble light structures. Due to their shape, they present multiple advantages in versatility, durability, and cost. Applicable to ASTM A513 standard. Rectangular Tube Rectangular hollow steel tubes with high strength and light weight. Versatile for structural assembly, allowing easy welding and cutting. Applicable to ASTM A513 standard.

General information

EPD OwnerT A 2000, S.A. de C.V.
Registration numberEPD-IES-0027227:002
EPD typeEPD of multiple products based on the average results of the product group
StatusValid
Initial version date2025-12-19
Validity date2030-12-18
Standards conformanceISO 14025:2006, EN 15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021
LicenseeEPD Mexico
Geographical scopeGlobal
An EPD may be updated or depublished if conditions change. This is the latest version of the EPD.

Programme information

ProgrammeThe International EPD® System 
AddressEPD International AB Box 210 60 SE-100 31 Stockholm Sweden
Websitewww.environdec.com
E-mailsupport@environdec.com

Product category rules

CEN standard EN 15804 serves as the Core Product Category Rules (PCR)
Product Category Rules (PCR)2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) (version 2.0.1) 2.0.1
PCR review was conducted byThe Technical Committee of the International EPD System. See www.environdec.com for a list of members. Review chair: Rob Rouwette (chair), Noa Meron (co-chair). The review panel may be contacted via the Secretariat www.environdec.com/support.

Verification

LCA accountabilityDulce Alejandra Zaragoza Ayala, dzaragoza@cadis.earth, T A 2000, S.A. de C.V. andrea.sohe98@gmail.com, andrea.sohe98@gmail.com, T A 2000, S.A. de C.V.
Independent third-party verification of the declaration and data, according to ISO 14025:2006, via
Third-party verifierFrancisco Jesús Campo Rámila (IK Ingeniería S.L.)
Approved byInternational EPD System
Procedure for follow-up of data during EPD validity involves third party verifier
*EPD Process Certification involves an accredited certification body certifying and periodically auditing the EPD process and conducting external and independent verification of EPDs that are regularly published. More information can be found in the General Programme Instructions on www.envrondec.com.

Ownership and limitation on use of EPD

Limitations

EPDs within the same product category but published in different EPD programmes, may not be comparable. For two EPDs to be comparable, they shall be based on the same PCR (including the same first-digit version number) or be based on fully aligned PCRs or versions of PCRs; cover products with identical functions, technical performances and use (e.g. identical declared/functional units); have identical scope in terms of included life-cycle stages (unless the excluded life-cycle stage is demonstrated to be insignificant); apply identical impact assessment methods (including the same version of characterisation factors); and be valid at the time of comparison.

Ownership

The EPD Owner has the sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.

Information about EPD Owner

EPD OwnerT A 2000, S.A. de C.V.
Contact person nameGuadalupe Román Hernández
Contact person e-mailgroman@ta42.com
Organisation addressMexico Orizaba 94450 Carretera Federal Mex-Ver Km 321 S/N Interior 2 C.P. 94450 Ixtaczoquitlán, Veracruz

Description of the organisation of the EPD Owner

T A 2000 has more than 30 years of experience in the manufacture of steel. Innovation and optimization in production processes have driven the company to renew and diversify its product catalog. In 2016 a cutting-edge technology has been implemented in T A 2000’s steelmaking plant: an electric arc furnace (EAF) QUANTUM. The EAF QUANTUM, based on an optimized preheating and melting concept, delivers minimum conversion costs, maximized output, and environmental compliance. T A 2000’s value proposal is to offer its customers quality steel. T A 2000 has been granted with ISO 9001:2015 certification and above all the company focuses on offering an unparalleled service, characterized by competitive delivery times and optimal business conditions for the growth of its clients. T A 2000 is permanently committed to offering the market a dynamic, competitive and quality option. So that, the company have distribution centers in: Orizaba, Mérida; Arriaga, Silao and a commercial office in Mexico City.

Organisation images

Organisation logo

Product information

Product nameTubing and Profiles manufactured from steel scrap by T A 2000
Product identification412
Product descriptionC-Type and Z-Type Purlins These profiles are manufactured from galvanized and prepainted pickled hot -rolled sheet, which is bent into sections, generating a "C" or "Z" shape. They have high structural capacity and wide functionality, mainly recommended for the Construction industry. Square, Round, and Rectangular Tubes Hollow steel bars in rectangular, square, and round shapes. Structural steel profiles have outstanding strength, and are used in light structures such as support columns, roofs, and mezzanines. Their versatility allows for easy welding and cutting. Square Tube Square hollow steel profiles used to assemble structures that do not require large sizes or weights. Due to their square shape, they have greater strength and stiffness than steel angles or channels. Applicable to ASTM A513 standard. Round Tube Round steel tubes are used to assemble light structures. Due to their shape, they present multiple advantages in versatility, durability, and cost. Applicable to ASTM A513 standard. Rectangular Tube Rectangular hollow steel tubes with high strength and light weight. Versatile for structural assembly, allowing easy welding and cutting. Applicable to ASTM A513 standard.
Product information from external sourceshttps://tyasa.com/
Technical purpose of productIt is a profile manufactured from galvanized steel sheet, which is bent into sections to form a “C”-shaped profile; it has high structural capacity, broad functionality, and is mainly recommended for the construction industry.
Manufacturing or service provision descriptionDescription of the manufacturing process The manufacturing of tubes and profiles at TYASA originates from flat steel produced through an integrated, energy-efficient process. The cycle begins with the reception and classification of scrap, which is weighed and stored upon arrival. Selected scrap is then preheated to approximately 600 °C using recovered heat from the electric arc furnace (Quantum), significantly reducing energy demand during the melting phase. Once melted, ferroalloys such as manganese and aluminum are added to the molten steel, followed by refining in a ladle furnace to ensure chemical precision. The steel undergoes vacuum degassing to eliminate dissolved gases, improving quality. The continuous casting process (CASTRIP®) forms the steel into sheet by pouring it onto casting rollers, where it solidifies via water cooling. This sheet is passed through a thickness adjustment mill and then cooled and coiled. The resulting hot-rolled coils enter a cold finishing stage. First, the sheet is tension leveled to relieve internal stress, then pickled to remove oxides and surface contaminants using abrasive projection. The cleaned sheet is uncoiled and sent through a forming mill, where it is gradually shaped into round, square, or rectangular tubular tubes or structural profiles like Monten using forming rollers. In the case of tubular products, edges are joined using a high-frequency welder. After formation, the product goes through a finishing mill, followed by cutting (shear) and optional punching. Final products are transported via roller conveyors, then stacked, labeled, and packaged for dispatch.
Material propertiesVolumetric mass density: 7850 kg/m3
Volumetric mass density:
7850 kg/m3
Manufacturing siteTA 2000 Orizaba Mexico Veracruz 94450 Carretera Federal México-Veracruz Km. 321, s/n, interior 2, Ixtaczoquitlán.
UN CPC code412. Products of iron or steel
Geographical scopeGlobal
Geographical scope descriptionThe raw materials are produced in several continents.

Product images

Technical characteristics and performance

Technical performance

Product nameGaugeAvailable lengthGradeFinishes and coatingsColor
C-Type14 & 16Length from 6 to 10 m, tolerance of -3 mm +6 mm per section.CommercialGalvanized, prepainted galvanized & prepainted pickled hot-rolled Gray, Green varnish & red purlin
Z-Type14 & 16Length from 10 to 12 m, tolerance of -3 mm +6 mm per section.CommercialGalvanized N/A

Content declaration

Content declaration of multiple productsThis EPD covers multiple products. The content declaration corresponds to a representative average, calculated based on the production-weighted contributions of each included product.
Hazardous and toxic substancesThe product does not contain any substances from the SVHC candidate list in concentrations exceeding 0.1% of its weight.
Product content
Content nameMass, kgPost-consumer recycled material, mass-% of productBiogenic material, mass-% of productBiogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Scrap steel904.3595.2800
Dolomitic lime36.71000
Steelmaking lime34.94000
Aluminium6.58000
Zinc1.7600
Coatings6.97000
Others8.7000
Total1000.0195.2800
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2
Packaging materials
Material nameMass, kgMass-% (versus the product)Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Steel2710.27050
Plastic15.40.01540
Total286.40.28590
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2

LCA information

EPD based on declared or functional unitDeclared unit
Declared unit and reference flow1000 kg of Tubing and Profiles manufactured from steel scrap during the year 2022 by TYASA at the Ixtaczoquitlán plant. Mass: 1000 kg
Conversion factor to mass1
Are infrastructure or capital goods included in any upstream, core or downstream processes?
Datasources used for this EPDecoinvent database (general) ecoinvent 3.10 database
LCA SoftwareSimaPro SimaPro 9.6
Version of the EN 15804 reference packageEF Reference Package 3.1
Characterisation methodsGlobal Warming Potential,GWP100 , EN 15804. Version: EF 3.1, February 2023. Acidification potential, AP, accumulated exceedence, EN 15804.Version: February 2023. Eutrophication potential (EP) Version 2.0 of the default list of indicators (valid from 2022-03-29). Photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP), POCP, LOTOSEUROS applied in ReCiPe, EN 15804. Version: February 2023. Ozone depletion potential (ODP), EN 15804. Version: February 2023. Abiotic depletion potential (ADP) for minerals and metals (non-fossil resources), ADP minerals & metals, EN 15804. Version: February 2023. Abiotic depletion potential (ADP) for fossil resources, ADP fossil resources, EN 15804. Version: August 2021. Water deprivation potential (WDP), (Available water remaining (AWARE) method), EN 15804.
Technology description including background systemTYASA manufactures steel tubes and profiles from recycled steel scrap through an energy-efficient process. The product range includes C- and Z-type purlins and hollow structural tubes in square, round, and rectangular shapes, all meeting ASTM A513 standards. These profiles are hot-rolled and available with various finishes such as galvanized, pre-painted, and pickled, offering high strength and versatility for construction and architectural applications like roofs, frames, pillars, scaffolding, and furniture. The composition is primarily steel scrap (over 90%), with more than 95% post-consumer recycled material. The manufacturing process involves scrap melting, refining, continuous casting, hot and cold rolling, pickling, and forming, followed by cutting and packaging.
Scrap (recycled material) inputs contribution levelMore than 10% of the GWP-GHG results in modules A1-A3 come from scrap inputs
Scrap (recycled material) inputs data
Material scrap nameMaterial scrap value
Steel scrap316, kg CO2 eq./tonne
The share of the total scrap input that was assumed to come with an environmental burden100%

Data quality assessment

Description of data quality assessment and reference yearsDirect data obtained from T A 2000 S.A. de C.V. is representative for 2022. According to ISO 14044, data validity verified during the collection process to provide evidence that the quality criteria required for the intended application are met. The data quality level and criteria used were based on the Product Category Rules (GPI 5.0.1, section A.5.4), the EN 15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021 standard (Annex E), and the PCR Construction Products v2.0.1, section 4.6.5.Data quality assessment was carried out using the following quality levels: very good, good, fair, poor, and very poor.
Data quality assessment
Process nameSource typeSourceReference yearData categoryShare of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A3
Extraction and processing of raw materials required for the manufacturing of productsCollected dataEPD owner2022Primary data 56%
Consumption of auxiliary materials during manufacturingCollected dataEPD owner2022Primary data 42%
Total share of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A398%
The share of primary data is calculated based on GWP-GHG results. It is a simplified indicator for data quality that supports the use of more primary data to increase the representativeness of and comparability between EPDs. Note that the indicator does not capture all relevant aspects of data quality and is not comparable across product categories.
Electricity data
Electricity used in the manufacturing process in A3 (A5 for services)
Type of electricity mixSpecific electricity mix as generated, or purchased from an electricity supplier, demonstrated by a contractual instrument
Energy sourcesHydro13.75%
Wind5.11%
Solar4.26%
Biomass0%
Geothermal1.02%
Waste0%
Nuclear3.43%
Natural gas67.39%
Coal4.45%
Oil0.58%
Peat0%
Other0.01%
GWP-GHG intensity (kg CO2 eq./kWh)0.41 kg CO2 eq./kWh

System boundary

Description of the system boundarya) Cradle to gate with modules C1-C4 and module D (A1-A3 + C + D).
Excluded modulesYes, there is an excluded module, or there are excluded modules
Justification for the omission of modulesA4, A5 and B module: Optional

Declared modules

Product stageConstruction process stageUse stageEnd of life stageBeyond product life cycle
Raw material supplyTransportManufacturingTransport to siteConstruction installationUseMaintenanceRepairReplacementRefurbishmentOperational energy useOperational water useDe-construction demolitionTransportWaste processingDisposalReuse-Recovery-Recycling-potential
ModuleA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Modules declaredXXXNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDXXXXX
GeographyGlobalGlobalMexicoN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexico
Share of specific data90%--------------
Variation - products10%--------------
Variation - sites0%--------------
DisclaimerThe share of specific/primary data and both variations (products and sites) refer to GWP-GHG results only.

Process flow diagram(s) related images

Default scenario

Name of the default scenarioEnd of life
Description of the default scenarioIn this study, the end-of-life treatment was modelled based on a scenario in which 98% of the steel is recovered and recycled, while the remaining 2% is sent to landfill.

Module C: End-of-life

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module CRecycling and landfill
Brief description of the default scenario in module C98% steel recycled; 2% landfilled after demolition, transport, sorting, and disposal
Module C informationValueUnit
C1 Demolition/deconstruction of steel1.1
kWh
C1 Demolition/deconstruction of steel80
km
C3 Loading and unloading at sorting facility, mechanical sorting and fragging of steel1.8
kWh
C3 Loading and unloading at sorting facility, mechanical sorting and fragging of steel2.2
kWh
C3 Loading and unloading at sorting facility, mechanical sorting and fragging of steel7.4
kWh
C4 Compacting inert construction waste for landfills1.6
kWh

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module DResource Recovery Stage
Brief description of the default scenario in module DBenefits from substituting virgin steel with recycled scrap, avoiding related impacts
Module D informationValueUnit
Amount of scrap content existing the system.98
%
Amount of scrap or recycled material contained in the product beyond the system boundary90
%

Environmental performance

The estimated impact results are only relative statements, which do not indicate the endpoints of the impact categories, exceeding threshold values, safety margins and/or risks.

Mandatory environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - totalGWP-totalkg CO2 eq.1.73E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.72E-11.22E+13.94E+01.08E-2-1.36E+2
Climate change - fossilGWP-fossilkg CO2 eq.1.73E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.72E-11.22E+13.94E+01.08E-2-1.36E+2
Climate change - biogenicGWP-biogenickg CO2 eq.8.26E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.60E-55.83E-41.74E-44.66E-7-8.27E-3
Climate change - land use and land-use changeGWP-luluckg CO2 eq.1.13E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.28E-53.99E-41.14E-43.72E-7-1.42E-2
Ozone depletionODPkg CFC-11 eq.2.23E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND5.85E-91.78E-77.11E-81.70E-10-2.98E-7
AcidificationAPmol H+ eq.7.16E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.48E-34.62E-23.01E-21.01E-4-4.28E-1
Eutrophication aquatic freshwaterEP-freshwaterkg P eq.4.85E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.51E-72.96E-51.05E-51.02E-8-4.50E-3
Eutrophication aquatic marineEP-marinekg N eq.1.86E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.63E-31.89E-21.37E-24.75E-5-8.67E-2
Eutrophication terrestrialEP-terrestrialmol N eq.2.05E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.79E-22.07E-11.51E-15.21E-4-1.01E+0
Photochemical ozone formationPOCPkg NMVOC eq.6.68E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND5.33E-36.71E-24.56E-21.55E-4-3.49E-1
Depletion of abiotic resources - minerals and metalsADP-minerals&metals1kg Sb eq.1.58E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.55E-87.26E-71.38E-74.52E-10-1.98E-5
Depletion of abiotic resources - fossil fuelsADP-fossil1MJ, net calorific value2.41E+4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND4.90E+01.65E+25.48E+11.42E-1-1.27E+3
Water useWDP1m3 world eq. deprived9.10E+2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.86E-31.49E-11.10E-11.12E-4-8.32E+0
AcronymsGWP-fossil = Global Warming Potential fossil fuels; GWP-biogenic = Global Warming Potential biogenic; GWP-luluc = Global Warming Potential land use and land use change; ODP = Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer; AP = Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance; EP-freshwater = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching freshwater end compartment; EP-marine = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching marine end compartment; EP-terrestrial = Eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance; POCP = Formation potential of tropospheric ozone; ADP-minerals&metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources; ADP-fossil = Abiotic depletion for fossil resources potential; WDP = Water (user) deprivation potential, deprivation-weighted water consumption
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator

Additional mandatory environmental performance indicators

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - GWP-GHGGWP-GHG1kg CO2 eq.1.73E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.72E-11.22E+13.94E+01.08E-2-1.36E+2
AcronymsGWP-GHG = Global warming potential greenhouse gas.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The GWP-GHG indicator is termed GWP-IOBC/GHG in the ILCD+EPD+ data format. The indicator accounts for all greenhouse gases except biogenic carbon dioxide uptake and emissions and biogenic carbon stored in the product. As such, the indicator is identical to GWP-total except that the CF for biogenic CO2 is set to zero.

Additional voluntary environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Particulate matter emissionsPMDisease incidence1.36E-4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND9.98E-88.50E-78.20E-72.90E-9-1.20E-5
Ionizing radiation - human healthIRP1kBq U235 eq.6.18E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND4.38E-41.12E-25.24E-21.27E-5-2.92E-1
Eco-toxicity - freshwaterETP-fw2CTUe7.64E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.69E-11.07E+11.54E+04.93E-3-4.90E+3
Human toxicity - cancer effectsHTP-c2CTUh1.55E-5NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.69E-108.12E-84.21E-91.07E-11-1.40E-5
Human toxicity - non-cancer effectsHTP-nc2CTUh8.84E-6NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND2.59E-111.03E-92.41E-107.54E-13-2.93E-7
Land-use related impacts/soil qualitySQP2Dimensionless2.49E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.04E-26.58E-11.78E-13.02E-4-1.41E+2
AcronymsPM = Potential incidence of disease due to particulate matter emissions; IRP = Potential human exposure efficiency relative to U235; ETP-fw = Potential comparative toxic unit for ecosystems; HTP-c = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; HTP-nc = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; SQP = Potential soil quality index.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
Disclaimer 2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator.

Resource use indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
PEREMJ, net calorific value2.40E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.10E-22.68E-11.34E+13.19E-4-1.29E+1
PERMMJ, net calorific value2.81E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+0-1.07E+10.00E+00.00E+0
PERTMJ, net calorific value2.43E+3NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.10E-22.68E-12.74E+03.19E-4-1.29E+1
PENREMJ, net calorific value2.56E+4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND5.20E+01.75E+21.73E+21.51E-1-1.35E+3
PENRMMJ, net calorific value3.00E+2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+0-1.14E+20.00E+00.00E+0
PENRTMJ, net calorific value2.59E+4NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND5.20E+01.75E+25.88E+11.51E-1-1.35E+3
SMkg9.04E+2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
RSFMJ, net calorific value0.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
NRSFMJ, net calorific value0.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
FWm32.36E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.54E-46.16E-32.85E-34.47E-6-2.18E-1
AcronymsPERE = Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERM = Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERT = Total use of renewable primary energy resources; PENRE = Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRM = Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRT = Total use of non-renewable primary energy re-sources; SM = Use of secondary material; RSF = Use of renewable secondary fuels; NRSF = Use of non-renewable secondary fuels; FW = Use of net fresh water.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Waste indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
HWDkg3.05E-1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND3.36E-51.13E-33.32E-49.77E-7-1.46E-2
NHWDkg1.47E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND1.43E-46.92E-31.93E-34.16E-6-8.43E-1
RWDkg3.69E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND2.50E-75.81E-62.09E-57.28E-9-1.85E-4
AcronymsHWD = Hazardous waste disposed; NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed; RWD = Radioactive waste disposed.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Output flow indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
CRUkg0.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
MFRkg3.92E+1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+09.80E+20.00E+00.00E+0
MERkg0.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
EEEMJ, net calorific value0.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
EETMJ, net calorific value0.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
AcronymsCRU = Components for re-use; MFR = Materials for recycling; MER = Materials for energy recovery; EEE = Exported electrical energy; EET = Exported thermal energy.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Additional environmental information

Tyasa has an Implementation Plan for the Environmental Management System for ISO 14001 with a progress of 75%, led by the Management Systems Department.

Description of how the averages have been determinedThe average value was determined by considering the included products and applying a weighting based on their respective production volumes.

Abbreviations

CADIS Centre for Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Design

CENACE National Center for Energy Control

EAF Electric arc furnace

EPD Environmental Product Declaration

GHG Greenhouse gases

GPI General Programme Instructions

GWP Global Warming Potential

LCA Life Cycle Assessment

PCR Product Category Rules

References

BIEE. (2023). Base de Indicadores de Eficiencia Energética de México. Obtained from https://www.biee-conuee.net/site/index.php

Coto, G., Rosa, E., Solano, A., & Zaragoza, D (2025), Life Cycle Assessment of Tubing and Profiles manufactured from steel scrap by T A 2000 , Center for Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Design – CADIS.

European Committee for Standardization. (2019). Sustainability of construction works — Environmental product declarations — Core rules for the product category of construction products (EN 15804:2012+A2:2019). CEN.

Frischknecht Rolf. (2007). Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. Ecoinvent report No. 3.

Huijbregts, M. A., Steinmann, Z. J., Elshout, P. M., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M. D., . . . van Zelm, R. (2017). ReCiPe 2016 v1.1. A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level Report I: Characterization. Bilthoven, The Netherlands:National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.

IMNC. (2008). NMX-SAA-14040-IMNC Gestión ambiental - Análisis de ciclo de vida - Principios y marco de referencia. México, D.F.: IMNC.

ISO 14020. (2000). Environmental Labels and Declarations — General Principles

ISO 14025. (2006). Type III Environmental Declarations.

ISO 14044. (2006). Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines. Suiza: International

Mexican Institute of Steel Construction. (n.d.). Structural steel: The green construction material par excellence. https://www.imca.org.mx/newsletters/news14.php

PCR 2019:14 Construction Products V 2.0.1. (2025-06-05). EPD System. Obtained from https://www.environdec.com/

PRé Consultants. (2010). Data base manual. Methods library. Retrieved abril 20, 2010, from http://www.pre.nl/download/manuals/DatabaseManualMethods.pdf

PRé Sustainability. (2021). SimaPro database manual. Methods library.

The International EPD System (2025). General Programme Instructions for The International EPD System. Version 5.0.1 Published on 2025-02-27.

Version history

Version 001, 2025-12-22

Original version of the EPD